Azure Application Monitor

Source code checked in, #70298

Project Collection Service Accounts — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:36:45 GMT

Upgrade: New Version of LabDefaultTemplate.xaml. To upgrade your build definitions, please visit the following link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=254563

Source code checked in, #70297

Project Collection Service Accounts — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:31:58 GMT

Checked in by server upgrade

Project License Changed

Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:02:41 GMT

Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) This license governs use of the accompanying software. If you use the software, you accept this license. If you do not accept the license, do not use the software. 1. Definitions The terms "reproduce," "reproduction," "derivative works," and "distribution" have the same meaning here as under U.S. copyright law. A "contribution" is the original software, or any additions or changes to the software. A "contributor" is any person that distributes its contribution under this license. "Licensed patents" are a contributor's patent claims that read directly on its contribution. 2. Grant of Rights (A) Copyright Grant- Subject to the terms of this license, including the license conditions and limitations in section 3, each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free copyright license to reproduce its contribution, prepare derivative works of its contribution, and distribute its contribution or any derivative works that you create. (B) Patent Grant- Subject to the terms of this license, including the license conditions and limitations in section 3, each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license under its licensed patents to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale, import, and/or otherwise dispose of its contribution in the software or derivative works of the contribution in the software. 3. Conditions and Limitations (A) No Trademark License- This license does not grant you rights to use any contributors' name, logo, or trademarks. (B) If you bring a patent claim against any contributor over patents that you claim are infringed by the software, your patent license from such contributor to the software ends automatically. (C) If you distribute any portion of the software, you must retain all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices that are present in the software. (D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a license that complies with this license. (E) The software is licensed "as-is." You bear the risk of using it. The contributors give no express warranties, guarantees or conditions. You may have additional consumer rights under your local laws which this license cannot change. To the extent permitted under your local laws, the contributors exclude the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement.

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

DanDaDaDanDan — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:20:25 GMT

MICROSOFT PUBLIC LICENSE (Ms-PL) is a good one most projects on codeplex seem to be using. MIT, BSD, Apache, etc. all work. The CDDL is kind of like the GPL AFAICT and therefore not meant for use with libraries. Not sure whether there is a LGPL kind of version of the CDDL, but if you don't care about the details any of the aforementioned ones work and is preferred :-) Thanks for considering a switch and the fast reply!

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

dpallmann — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:39:14 GMT

My intent is that people can use this any way they want to; I'm happy to change the license terms, but which license do you suggest?

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

DanDaDaDanDan — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:35:00 GMT

Adding a reference to the lib from within an app can be construed as covered software based on the definition in the license, henceforth requiring instrumented apps to be distributed with source if made available. Any chance you could change the license for this tool as it sounds neat :-)

Source code checked in, #48188

_TFSSERVICE — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:15:13 GMT

Checked in by server upgrade

Created Issue: When running this application on a system without Azure SDK, I get error. [3890]

stefh — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:08:00 GMT

microsoft.servicehosting.serviceruntime

New Post: Getting Security Exception with AzureMonitorLib.cs

frankmichaelkraft — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:30:07 GMT

Hello, I want to try out the AzureMonitor. However I am getting a Secutiry Exception with AzureMonitorLib.cs.

What does this mean?

public static void Start(string appName, string roleName, bool deleteOlderEntries)
        {
            if (TrackingActive) return;
            TrackingActive = true;

            // Get the update interval setting or default it.

            PerfCounterUpdateInterval = DEFAULT_PERF_COUNTER_UPDATE_INTERVAL;

            string value = TryGetConfigurationSetting("PerfCounterUpdateInterval");
            if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
            {
                try
                {
                    PerfCounterUpdateInterval = Convert.ToInt32(value);
                }
                catch (FormatException)
                {

                }
            }

            AppName = appName;
            RoleName = roleName;

            Initialize();

System.Security.SecurityException wurde nicht von Benutzercode behandelt.
  Message="Fehler bei der Anfrage."
  Source="AzureMonitorLib"
  StackTrace:
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Initialize()
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Start(String appName, String roleName, Boolean deleteOlderEntries) in C:\Projects\Azure\Tools\PerformanceMonitor\AzureMonitorSource\AzureMonitorLib\AzureMonitorLib.cs:Zeile 97.
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Start(String appName, String roleName) in C:\Projects\Azure\Tools\PerformanceMonitor\AzureMonitorSource\AzureMonitorLib\AzureMonitorLib.cs:Zeile 69.
       bei IntelliSign_WebRole._Default.Page_PreRender(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Projects\Azure\IntelliSign\code\IntelliSign_WebRole\Default.aspx.cs:Zeile 27.
       bei System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.UI.Control.OnPreRender(EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()
       bei System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
  InnerException:

Created Issue: Development Fabric not starting up

frankmichaelkraft — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:43:22 GMT

When I have Application Monitor in my project, the deployment to the dev fabric times out. I have tried at least 6 times, restarted dev fabric, restarted computer. No success.
When I take app monitor out of the project - all works well again.
I have vs 2008 team suite. Also I have the Azure June 2009 SDK.

New Post: Surface Interface for AAM

dpallmann — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:09:32 GMT

That would be cool, but also expensive given the current price of Surface units. A less expensive option would be to create a WPF or Silverlight monitoring solution with a big display monitor in mind and take advantage of the Multi Touch feature that is coming in Windows 7.

New Post: Surface Interface for AAM

joelercoaster — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:33:48 GMT

I have been day-dreaming about a surface interface for the cloud (Azure)... imagine a surface device sitting in the middle of an IT Control Center (since the Data Center would be on the cloud), Operators use the surface for monitoring performance, basically everything an application of this nature (AAM) could offer but with a surface experience.

What do you guys think?

Joel Reyes

Updated Release: 1.0 (Mar 25, 2009)

dpallmann — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:52:23 GMT