AzureMonitor Discussions Rss Feed

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

DanDaDaDanDan — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:20:25 GMT

MICROSOFT PUBLIC LICENSE (Ms-PL) is a good one most projects on codeplex seem to be using. MIT, BSD, Apache, etc. all work. The CDDL is kind of like the GPL AFAICT and therefore not meant for use with libraries. Not sure whether there is a LGPL kind of version of the CDDL, but if you don't care about the details any of the aforementioned ones work and is preferred :-) Thanks for considering a switch and the fast reply!

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

dpallmann — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:39:14 GMT

My intent is that people can use this any way they want to; I'm happy to change the license terms, but which license do you suggest?

New Post: License prevents instrumenting non-open source apps

DanDaDaDanDan — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:35:00 GMT

Adding a reference to the lib from within an app can be construed as covered software based on the definition in the license, henceforth requiring instrumented apps to be distributed with source if made available. Any chance you could change the license for this tool as it sounds neat :-)

New Post: Getting Security Exception with AzureMonitorLib.cs

frankmichaelkraft — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:30:07 GMT

Hello, I want to try out the AzureMonitor. However I am getting a Secutiry Exception with AzureMonitorLib.cs.

What does this mean?

public static void Start(string appName, string roleName, bool deleteOlderEntries)
        {
            if (TrackingActive) return;
            TrackingActive = true;

            // Get the update interval setting or default it.

            PerfCounterUpdateInterval = DEFAULT_PERF_COUNTER_UPDATE_INTERVAL;

            string value = TryGetConfigurationSetting("PerfCounterUpdateInterval");
            if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
            {
                try
                {
                    PerfCounterUpdateInterval = Convert.ToInt32(value);
                }
                catch (FormatException)
                {

                }
            }

            AppName = appName;
            RoleName = roleName;

            Initialize();

System.Security.SecurityException wurde nicht von Benutzercode behandelt.
  Message="Fehler bei der Anfrage."
  Source="AzureMonitorLib"
  StackTrace:
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Initialize()
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Start(String appName, String roleName, Boolean deleteOlderEntries) in C:\Projects\Azure\Tools\PerformanceMonitor\AzureMonitorSource\AzureMonitorLib\AzureMonitorLib.cs:Zeile 97.
       bei Neudesic.Azure.AzureMonitor.Start(String appName, String roleName) in C:\Projects\Azure\Tools\PerformanceMonitor\AzureMonitorSource\AzureMonitorLib\AzureMonitorLib.cs:Zeile 69.
       bei IntelliSign_WebRole._Default.Page_PreRender(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Projects\Azure\IntelliSign\code\IntelliSign_WebRole\Default.aspx.cs:Zeile 27.
       bei System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.UI.Control.OnPreRender(EventArgs e)
       bei System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()
       bei System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
  InnerException:

New Post: Surface Interface for AAM

dpallmann — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:09:32 GMT

That would be cool, but also expensive given the current price of Surface units. A less expensive option would be to create a WPF or Silverlight monitoring solution with a big display monitor in mind and take advantage of the Multi Touch feature that is coming in Windows 7.

New Post: Surface Interface for AAM

joelercoaster — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:33:48 GMT

I have been day-dreaming about a surface interface for the cloud (Azure)... imagine a surface device sitting in the middle of an IT Control Center (since the Data Center would be on the cloud), Operators use the surface for monitoring performance, basically everything an application of this nature (AAM) could offer but with a surface experience.

What do you guys think?

Joel Reyes